🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based citizen has been convicted of uploading nude segments from copyrighted movies and television shows on the social media platform Reddit.

According to a law enforcement report reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed man shared 347 video excerpts of explicit scenes in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

The country's police state he has been given a seven-month deferred sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts say the man was prosecuted under a rarely-used provision in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the court finding that by removing the footage out of their original context, the man had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user known as "the pseudonym KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit scenes including over 100 actresses.

He shared them in the subreddit he was a moderator of.

According to the Danish copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his online community had more than 6,000 subscribers and participants were encouraged to request clips of specific actors.

In 2023, advocates reported the case to the authorities on behalf of the affected artists, directors and production companies, which led to the forum being shut down.

One actress, one of the performers whose nude scenes were shared in the group, told Danish media at the time she felt there was a difference between appearing unclothed in a movie and being shown on Reddit.

The performer stated the posts constituted "abuse".

'An important message'

The man was detained in September 2024 and admitted culpable to the allegations last month.

In a statement after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund remarked the decision sent an "significant" signal "that violations of creators' entitlements has repercussions".

The verdict is considered unprecedented in the country for its application of the "ethical protections" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which specifies an artist's creation cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their standing.

Intellectual property expert a legal scholar informed BBC News the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

How the case could influence nations abroad is unclear.

But she added there may be "an increasing number of such cases" in the coming years with the growth of AI, where "the sanctity of one's work might be tempered with with greater ease".