🔗 Share this article

At first, Donald Trump seemed to take a firm approach concerning the Ukrainian conflict. After issuing threats of "significant ramifications" in August in case Russia's president persisted obstructing ceasefire talks, the former president eventually imposed substantial penalties on the Russian biggest energy firms, Rosneft and Lukoil. This move seriously hindered Putin's capability to fund his war effort in the region.

However, via his newly presented comprehensive peace proposal for the conflict, that was drafted by US and Russian diplomats lacking Ukrainian or EU participation, Trump has clearly returned to his pro-Putin stance.

Rewarding Aggression

Trump's proposal would effectively favor the Russian leader for occupying a sovereign nation while placing the country's democratic system in jeopardy. Although strong statements that "The nation's autonomy will be confirmed", large portions of the proposal in reality compromise that very autonomy. This constitutes a Moscow's wish would certainly be a disaster for Ukraine.

Demonstrating his corporate past, Trump continues to view the war as a basic territorial dispute, as if handing Russia a part of Ukrainian land will appease the leader. However, Russia's invasion is not only about controlling a damaged swath of deindustrialized territory in the Donbas region. Rather, it is about Ukraine's democracy – and Putin's clear goal to weaken it so it ceases to functions as an attractive example for the Russian people of the accountable government that Putin's deepening authoritarian rule prevents them.

Land Concessions

While maintaining in position the presently split regions of these areas, Trump's proposal would compel Ukraine to give up the entire Donetsk region. In addition to rewarding Russia with land that its military have been failed to seize in exceeding a decade of fighting, this surrender would render Ukraine's defensive positions dangerously undermined.

This region is the site of the nation's highly-touted "stronghold system", the entrenched defensive positions that constitute a critical impediment to invading forces. The proposal would have the Ukrainian military surrender these positions, giving Russian forces a clear route to the capital in case he eventually choose to renew the war.

Military Reductions

Additionally, in a move that would enable renewed fighting simpler for Russia, the plan would require the nation to cut the size of its armed forces from their present 800,000 to 850,000 personnel to a limit of six hundred thousand. Significantly, the plan imposes no such restrictions on the invading army.

Apparently as a accommodation to Russia's efforts to portray Ukraine's chosen by the people government as radicals, the proposal states: "Every extremist belief system and activities must be opposed and forbidden." As if to highlight this element, it insists that "Ukraine will hold elections in this period" of a truce. However, Trump sets no obligation that Putin jeopardize his regime by holding democratic processes in his own country.

Protection Assurances

Certainly, the initiative has Russia promise not to "attack bordering nations" and to "establish in regulation its position of non-aggression towards Europe and the Ukrainian people". But considering that the Russian leadership has violated equivalent agreements in the past – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which the Russian government promised to recognize Ukraine's borders in return for giving up its historical nuclear arsenal, and the Minsk accords, in which Moscow agreed to a truce and a restoration of captured areas in the region to Kyiv – why should anyone trust Putin now?

This explains Ukraine has been so insistent on western security guarantees. While the plan promises a "strong joint armed reaction" if Russia renew its aggression, and states that "Ukraine will receive strong defense commitments", the particulars vary from unclear to troubling. The proposal would not just deny the nation Nato membership but also preclude member states from positioning forces on Ukrainian territory, thereby preventing the peacekeeping contingent, reportedly commanded by European powers, on which the Ukrainian government had been depending to prevent Russia from rebuilding his reduced troops, re-equipping, and reinvading.

World Reaction

A separate parallel deal apparently would offer the nation with a alliance-like defense commitment, in which any future "major, intentional, and continuous aggression" by Russia on the country "would be considered as an act of war endangering the stability and safety of the transatlantic community." This implies a military response. But in contrast to a capable Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's primary deterrent against renewed invasion – the effectiveness of the side agreement would depend on the commitment of alliance members, such as Trump, to respond militarily to Putin's attacks, something they have {not