🔗 Share this article

In a significant regulatory appeal, a national review panel has overturned a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an directive sought by the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the eSafety commissioner applied to the review board to assess and rate the available footage. It first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the commissioner to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the videos for users in Australia.

The platform X filed an appeal for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

X argued the video was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". X drew a parallel between the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the classification panel concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing could have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board revised the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the board disagreed, contending the video was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as that footage was made public years after the event, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the ruling.

"X fought this decision to defend freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these principles."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the eSafety commissioner did not issue formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been instructed to use warning labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.