Relatives' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards
The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”
The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.